Case Summary
In 31 BC, a wooden slip records the sale of 35 mu of land in Changle Li by Le Nu for 900 coins. The contract stated that if later measurement showed a deficit, Le Nu would refund the buyer proportionally. After the transaction, the buyer discovered the actual area was less than 35 mu and demanded a refund per the clause. When Le Nu refused, the dispute was brought before the local Han magistrate. The case centered on enforcing the explicit deficiency clause, highlighting the binding nature of written contracts in Han China and the availability of legal remedies for breach of private agreements.
Status or Result
No historical trial record has been found. Given standard Han legal practice of upholding written contracts, it is presumed the magistrate ordered Le Nu to compensate the buyer for the deficient land according to the agreed formula.
Key Disputes
Whether the measured land area fell short of the contracted 35 mu, thus activating the contractual penalty requiring the seller to refund money for the missing area.
Social Impact
The unearthed contract and its inferred dispute reveal highly developed private property transactions and contractual safeguards in the Han Dynasty. It illustrates the use of witness formalities, liquidated damages clauses, and state backing of private agreements, providing crucial insight into early Chinese civil law and land tenure systems.
Adapted Novels (1)
Feedback & Corrections


No comments yet. Be the first to comment!